flat non-rotaing earth science papers: us mil, us intel, us nasa, ru russia, private contractors pastor dean odle rob skiba

[
shootingrubberbandsatthestars note: i am hoping we can get pastor dean and skiba out of the octagon...
this will help:
jew jewish judaism = tanakh this means old testament from judea
pharisi pharisee pharisaism = talmud/torah from israel, skiba makes the mistake of saying "torah" where he should be saying "tanakh"
skiba: there is no such thing as a torah observant "jew," there are torah observant pharisees as that was the ploy of the israelian pharisees prior to writing their talmud manifesto which was to create their own religious sect which was different from judea's tanakh - and that is when the pharisees first started to "observe" the first 5 books of the old testament - the pentateuche/torah about 140 BC
two different religions,, let me remind odle and skiba of Revelations 2:9 and 3:9 and this religious war of subjugation goes on today: pharisaism vs judaism, it makes anti-Semitic war on judaism to call a pharisee a "jew" and is a tactic of israel to assume the name of "jew" which is not theirs, this is religious espionage, guise, infiltration, assimilation, stolen valor, stolen name, further: israel is a state (this is good) but israel is not a jewish state - they have no jews in israel as far as i know, if you wanna find jews go to the rock carved churches of ethiopia where the jews study,
the demonym of israel should utterly not be "jews" mostly in number they are secular,, second-most in number they are pharisi [this means talmud/torah] which are simply unaware that they are not jews, it is pitiful, they do not know which religion they are,, smh, what i am saying is very pro-Semitic and pro-Israel trying to help them back to being on the right track. God bless them
the tanakh = old testament
i downloaded this list from skiba's
http://www.testingtheglobe.com/media/FE-Military-Gov-Docs.txt
but the real research was done by pastor dean odle out of arkansas
https://www.youtube.com/user/FireGraceChurch/videos
http://electricitymachine.com/txt/fe-military-gov-docs.txt
]

Here are some of the documents used in Pastor Dean's message "Government Documents Admit Flat Earth:"

Russia 1948
Shape of the earth unknown..
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000600231031-1.pdf
[CIA-RDP80-00809A000600231031-1.pdf]

Russian Light Study
"Brightness of the firmament"
Flat earth:
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3.pdf
[CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3.pdf]

Government Definition of Geoid
https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GEOID/geoid_def.html
[what-is-the-geoid.html]

Propagation of Electromagnetic Fields Over Flat Earth
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TR-2352.pdf
[ARL-TR-2352.pdf]

page 9: based upon the signal having a single bounce on a flat Earth
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2009/ARL-TR-4998.pdf
[ARL-TR-4998.pdf]

page 1:
Trajectory of Spinning Projectiles:
"These equations assume a flat Earth."
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-TR-5118.pdf
[ARL-TR-5118.pdf]

page 2:
"These equations assume a flat Earth.."
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2011/ARL-TR-5810.pdf
[ARL-TR-5810.pdf]

page 216:
"assuming a flat Earth"
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/2007papers/paper21.pdf
[paper21.pdf]

Page 1:
"...so that a flat-earth approximation provides the best estimate."
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TN-175.pdf
[ARL-TN-175.pdf]

Page 39:
model works over a flat earth
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-TR-2696.pdf
[ARL-TR-2696.pdf]

page 1:
transmission loss over flat earth
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-2156.pdf
[ARL-TR-2156.pdf]

page 9:
"...input to a flat earth"
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-MR-563.pdf
[ARL-MR-563.pdf]

page 3:
"The first is the Earth-fixed coordinate system, which is fixed to the Earth with a flat Earth assumption."
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-CR-650.pdf
[ARL-CR-650.pdf]

page: 1
flat earth approximation provides the best estimate
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2002/ARL-TR-2683.pdf
[ARL-TR-2683.pdf]

page 32:
This model works well over a flat-earth
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-1812.pdf
[ARL-TR-1812.pdf]

page 168:
equations of flat-earth trigonometry.
http://www.irig106.org/docs/106-17/106-17_Telemetry_Standards.pdf
[106-17_Telemetry_Standards.pdf]

page 8:
The Earth is flat and nonrotating.
broken link
http://www.navair.navy.mil/nawcwd/command/Inplace.aspx/LoadFile/531

General Equations of Motion for Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft
Page 1: "...equations of motions must properly reflect the underlying physics."
page 2:
"In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth are developed..."
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf
[20070030307.pdf]

Approximate Optimal Guidance for the Advanced Launch System
On page one this document does mention a spherical rotating earth but then states that "...these schemes" (based on a spherical rotating earth) 1) "...are difficult to prove" and 2) "...not suggested to be used as a basis for an online real-time guidance law."

Page 32 goes on to say:
"Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented."
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf
[19940020279.pdf]

SR-71
Page 8 "...nonrotating Earth..."
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88507main_H-2179.pdf
[88507main_H-2179.pdf]

page 14:
(2) A flat, nonrotating earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf
[19710018599.pdf]

page 8:
the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf
[20040008097.pdf]

page 108:
aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth
page:12
"aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf
[88072main_H-1259.pdf]

NASA Technical Paper 2835
September 1988
Page 1 Summary:
Flat nonrotating earth
Last page 126:
"The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with a stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth"
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf
[19890007066.pdf]

Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll Stabilized Platform
NASA
March 1972
page 2:
"The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth"
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf
[19720012071.pdf]

An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge
NASA
1991
page 11:
"The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf
[88248main_H-1777.pdf]

Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields
NASA 1973
page14 pdf or 6 on actual report:
a) The earth is flat and non-rotating.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf
[19790005472.pdf]

A Mathematical Model of the CH-53 Helicopter
NASA
page 17:
"The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to a flat, nonrotating Earth."
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf
[19810003557.pdf]

Atmospheric Oscillations
Georgia Tech April 1965
Prepared for NASA
page 13:
A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf
[19650015408.pdf]

Stability and Control Estimation Flight Test Results for the SR-71 Aircraft With Externally Mounted Experiments
NASA
June 2002
page 18-19:
"These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth."
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf
[88733main_H-2465.pdf]

Flight Testing a VSTOL Aircraft
NASA 1988
page 9 pdf or 4-5 on actual doc:
"For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth..."
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf
[19880014378.pdf]

Time to Climb
page2:
"In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf
[20060053337.pdf]